The IHSAN Network - The Sunna Project brochure - Background
Start
Introduction
Hadith Texts
Hadith Indices
Electronic Publishing
IHSAN
 

BACKGROUND

 

ne of the largest and most diverse literatures in the world, the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad has for fourteen centuries supplemented the Qur’an as a source of guidance for followers of Islam. Ranging over topics as varied as doctrine, prayer, taxation, government, fasting, pilgrimage, and spirituality, this unique reservoir of religious guidance is an indispensable foundation for the study and understanding of any aspect of the Muslim religion.


The sheer volume of this material has, however, frustrated all efforts to collate it as a single, all-embracing anthology. Instead, scholars have always made use of a large number of individual collections, each of which brings together material reported by certain types of narrators, on a certain range of topics, or selected according to a particular standard of authenticity.


Since the decline of the manuscript tradition, with its meticulous and detailed methods of presenting texts by use of coloured inks, diverse calligraphic styles, and certificates of authorised transmission, printing techniques have presided over the progressive deterioration in the visual and academic quality of these collections. Attempts were made in the late nineteenth century to mobilise traditional scholarship in the creation of authoritative and careful editions, but these trailed off in the twentieth century, a time of declining scholarly input and the growing prevalence of commercial pressures. The result is that although several hundred hadith collections are today available in print, there are few editions which can be trusted implicitly by scholars. Many major hadith collections have never been made available to the public in a complete or accurate form, the current editions simply reproducing first editions made fifty or more years ago on the basis of single, late manuscripts. More worrying still, from the traditional Muslim perspective, has been the failure to consult living scholars who are qualified in the traditional manner, and whose oral memory and knowledge of proper Arabic style might have enormously enhanced the reliability and academic value of the printed books. Even those texts which have appeared in some semblance of a scholarly guise nevertheless typically fail to supply the indexes without which the use of such large and complex texts becomes a laborious and inefficient task.

 

 

 •  •  •  •  •  •